A Theoretical Debate and Strategy to Link Structure and Agency in Policy Process Studies: A Network Perspective
نویسنده
چکیده
Questions of policy formation/implementation are often translated into the language of power, and the policy process is undoubtedly a political issue rather than a technical issue. Studies of the policy process are used to apply either a structural or individual perspective to explain power distribution in policy formation/implementation and have also led to the methodological puzzle of what the real policy process is or what it is made up of. This paper attempts to review previous works on this subject and provide a suitable framework to link structural and individual perspectives in the study of state policy process. Traditional state policy process approaches such as Marxist theory, the Pluralist approach, the Elite approach and the Corporatism approach are discussed to demonstrate the methodological controversy of different analytical levels. In order to grasp a more comprehensive understanding of the policy process, the interests and interactions of the political actors, the institutional rules of game, the distribution of political resources, the power construct of choices, and political judgements should be considered in the research framework. It can be argued that the policy network approach (or network perspective) can be seen as an appropriate strategy to combine microscopic and macroscopic analysis of policy process.
منابع مشابه
Agency, Structure and the Power of Global Health Networks
Global health networks—webs of individuals and organizations linked by a shared concern for a particular condition—have proliferated over the past quarter century. In a recent editorial in this journal, I presented evidence that their effectiveness in addressing four challenges—problem definition, positioning, coalitionbuilding and governance—shapes their ability to influence policy. The editor...
متن کاملAgency, Cyberspace, and Social Contract
The social contract has been about rights and responsibilities in human societies. Facebook and its role in manufacturing and sustaining a global social contract, a new “we” is clearly one of the research areas that needs more attention. A new “we” is coming of age in the new age of connectivity and communication with a new outlook toward responsibility and rights at individual and collective l...
متن کاملPower and Politics in the Global Health Landscape: Beliefs, Competition and Negotiation Among Global Advocacy Coalitions in the Policy-Making Process
Background Advocacy coalitions play an increasingly prominent role within the global health landscape, linking actors and institutions to attract political attention and resources. This paper examines how coalitions negotiate among themselves and exercise hidden forms of power to produce policy on the basis of their beliefs and strategic interests. Methods This paper examines the beliefs and ...
متن کاملA Case for Open Network Health Systems: Systems as Networks in Public Mental Health
Increases in incidents involving so-called confused persons have brought attention to the potential costs of recent changes to public mental health (PMH) services in the Netherlands. Decentralized under the (Community) Participation Act (2014), local governments must find resources to compensate for reduced central funding to such services or “innovate.” But innovation, even when pressure for c...
متن کاملSystematic & Structural Analysis of Innovation System of Iran’s Oil Industr
In this descriptive qualitative research with case study research strategy, the Iranian oil industry innovation system in the form of adopting a structural and functional approach (systemic approach) in depth and in its natural context from the perspective of the participants studied. Based on theoretical framework that includes five systemic components of innovation system, actors and relation...
متن کامل